sâmbătă, noiembrie 24, 2007
windows 2000 sbs trust
I hope some day I'll have time merge this blog with older articles from http://fac.ce.vreau.eu.org/sbs.html ...
sâmbătă, iunie 09, 2007
windows (sau pe unde isi mai ascund baietii pornul)
miercuri, mai 16, 2007
luni, martie 19, 2007
too many bytes
joi, februarie 08, 2007
'n' things to do before you die
sorry english speakers, i just could't resist writing this in romanian. i feel so good expressing my feelings in my soo much flexible native romanian language. any other language simply cannot catch and express a detail so good as romanian.
deci. întîi am văzut in carfur '1001 de filme de văzut intr-o viata'. si-a aprins un beculeţ: cum adică, după ce le vad ce fac, sunt bun de îngropat? am zis ok, da-i in p*la mea de dobitoci cu formularea lor. da, ok, 1001 de filme de vazut, dar imi bag p*la in expresia lor de cacat 'intr-o viata'. puteau sa zica 'cele mai bune 1001 filme' sau '1001 filme care merita vazute'
apoi, dupa probabil succesul ce l-o fi avut, am auzit de '1001 albume de ascultat intr-o viata'. nu m-am mai enervat, nici nu mai aveam de unde: ma consumasem deja la vederea cartii anterioare. iar daca nu sunt chiar asa pasionat de vazut filme, la muzica prefer sa ma documentez singur din diverse surse, nu din carti la moda.
...
booon. chair uitasem de imbecilii astia, cand dau de un link 'fifteen geek movies to see before you die' care mi-a ridicat din nou numarul de pule pe propozitie indreptat catre autorul articolului. adica ok, inteleg, cele doua carti se adreseaza pulimii avide de mereu ceva nou, trecem peste ele, dar sa te consideri "as much a film geek as a tech geek" si sa vii tu cu aceeasi expresie de cacat in fata unei cu totul si cu totul alt tip de cititori, despre care se presupune ca ar avea oaresce iesire in evidenta a iq-ului fata de medie, mi se pare de cacat.
cam atat.
deci. întîi am văzut in carfur '1001 de filme de văzut intr-o viata'. si-a aprins un beculeţ: cum adică, după ce le vad ce fac, sunt bun de îngropat? am zis ok, da-i in p*la mea de dobitoci cu formularea lor. da, ok, 1001 de filme de vazut, dar imi bag p*la in expresia lor de cacat 'intr-o viata'. puteau sa zica 'cele mai bune 1001 filme' sau '1001 filme care merita vazute'
apoi, dupa probabil succesul ce l-o fi avut, am auzit de '1001 albume de ascultat intr-o viata'. nu m-am mai enervat, nici nu mai aveam de unde: ma consumasem deja la vederea cartii anterioare. iar daca nu sunt chiar asa pasionat de vazut filme, la muzica prefer sa ma documentez singur din diverse surse, nu din carti la moda.
...
booon. chair uitasem de imbecilii astia, cand dau de un link 'fifteen geek movies to see before you die' care mi-a ridicat din nou numarul de pule pe propozitie indreptat catre autorul articolului. adica ok, inteleg, cele doua carti se adreseaza pulimii avide de mereu ceva nou, trecem peste ele, dar sa te consideri "as much a film geek as a tech geek" si sa vii tu cu aceeasi expresie de cacat in fata unei cu totul si cu totul alt tip de cititori, despre care se presupune ca ar avea oaresce iesire in evidenta a iq-ului fata de medie, mi se pare de cacat.
cam atat.
vineri, decembrie 15, 2006
Trusting your antivirus is not enough
We trust our antivirus. We trust our firewall. We trust our system administrators.
We strongly believe that the system along with its system administrators are simply enough to make us feel protected against computer viruses and other electronic threats.
This was a true assumption until recently when internet and email became natural extensions to our electronic tool.
Humans need to communicate - it’s their nature! - so connecting the computers was an expected and normal thing that happened after late 90’s. But this interconnection came with a lot of other unexpected consequences: an increased number of malicious people started to exploit weakness present in various computer systems that were originally designed for isolated use, thus resulting an increasing number of viruses. As a reaction, a lot of companies spotted the danger and started to create so-called antivirus programs that proved efficient and made users happy.
Anyone can teach someone how to write a letter. You can learn from anyone how does a phone work. Apparently these days anyone seem to be able to introduce anyone into computerworld.
However, nobody can fool you to hurt yourself while using a pen and a piece of paper. But there were a lot of people tricked into dialling special calling high-rate numbers. And now there are even more people being tricked into doing a lot of actions against the computer.
Now, using computers needs a little bit more than usual ‘from person to person’ knowledge transfer and antivirus systems.
Being correctly informed about our electronic tool makes the difference between using the computer as its purpose and wasting invaluable time waiting to get it fixed: in 2003 and 2004, the combined economic damage from viruses like ‘sobig’ and ‘mydoom’ were over $100 billion worldwide, even if companies have had antiviruses installed and updated, because the virus spread was so quick – hours - that antiviruses could not develop an update fast enough before the wide spread!
I've seen too many infected computers, event with the latest virus definitions installed on their antivirus. I do not know what is the word in english or if the english language has an equivalent for this, but romanian native speakers would surely understand the expression "colcăie de atîţia viruşi". Why?
The greatest danger to regular computer users I see these days are not hackers or viruses. While they are the root cause, the originator of targeted attacks, they cannot succeed without our help:
- we help spreading viruses when we open attachments in email messages
- we help hackers succeed when we click on internet addresses received via email or instant messaging, because we assume we are protected by the system, the antivirus and the system administrators.
However, the strongest protection against these types of attacks are suprisingly, ourselves: the computer users.
DO NOT OPEN OR SAVE
e-mail attachments that you receive from un-trusted people
or that you receive unexpectedly from trusted people
DO NOT CLICK ON
internet addresses (links) that you receive from un-trusted people
or that you receive unexpectedly from trusted people
We strongly believe that the system along with its system administrators are simply enough to make us feel protected against computer viruses and other electronic threats.
This was a true assumption until recently when internet and email became natural extensions to our electronic tool.
Humans need to communicate - it’s their nature! - so connecting the computers was an expected and normal thing that happened after late 90’s. But this interconnection came with a lot of other unexpected consequences: an increased number of malicious people started to exploit weakness present in various computer systems that were originally designed for isolated use, thus resulting an increasing number of viruses. As a reaction, a lot of companies spotted the danger and started to create so-called antivirus programs that proved efficient and made users happy.
Anyone can teach someone how to write a letter. You can learn from anyone how does a phone work. Apparently these days anyone seem to be able to introduce anyone into computerworld.
However, nobody can fool you to hurt yourself while using a pen and a piece of paper. But there were a lot of people tricked into dialling special calling high-rate numbers. And now there are even more people being tricked into doing a lot of actions against the computer.
Now, using computers needs a little bit more than usual ‘from person to person’ knowledge transfer and antivirus systems.
Being correctly informed about our electronic tool makes the difference between using the computer as its purpose and wasting invaluable time waiting to get it fixed: in 2003 and 2004, the combined economic damage from viruses like ‘sobig’ and ‘mydoom’ were over $100 billion worldwide, even if companies have had antiviruses installed and updated, because the virus spread was so quick – hours - that antiviruses could not develop an update fast enough before the wide spread!
I've seen too many infected computers, event with the latest virus definitions installed on their antivirus. I do not know what is the word in english or if the english language has an equivalent for this, but romanian native speakers would surely understand the expression "colcăie de atîţia viruşi". Why?
The greatest danger to regular computer users I see these days are not hackers or viruses. While they are the root cause, the originator of targeted attacks, they cannot succeed without our help:
- we help spreading viruses when we open attachments in email messages
- we help hackers succeed when we click on internet addresses received via email or instant messaging, because we assume we are protected by the system, the antivirus and the system administrators.
However, the strongest protection against these types of attacks are suprisingly, ourselves: the computer users.
DO NOT OPEN OR SAVE
e-mail attachments that you receive from un-trusted people
or that you receive unexpectedly from trusted people
DO NOT CLICK ON
internet addresses (links) that you receive from un-trusted people
or that you receive unexpectedly from trusted people
duminică, decembrie 10, 2006
yahoo messenger stupidity
Abonaţi-vă la:
Postări (Atom)




